I just produced 150 cassettes of my new album and people like it to have it on cassette, even if they do not have a player. But they can hold something physical in there hands while listening on-line.
And yeah, I've produced, mixed and mastered the whole album, so I can say for sure, the cassettes sounds much much better and organic then the _same_ master on Spotify.
It's a subtle mixture of tape compression, saturation, hiss, eqing, jitter that makes it somehow lively. And it will sound slightly different on every owns tape player.
luckys 20 minutes ago [-]
There's something about analog I can't quite put my finger on it. Take digital photography for example. No matter how sharp, how "vibrant" the photos from a really good digital camera of today, it doesn't feel the same as photos from some 50 year old Nikon or Canon. Call it nostalgia if you will, but digital for all its strenghts seems to miss something
ecalifornica 26 minutes ago [-]
You’re right, being able to hold the music is nice. PDF liner notes aren’t the same. For your next release you might be interested in the cassette label run by a friend of mine: helloamericalit.com
Bjartr 33 minutes ago [-]
If the track played though a cassette is that much of an improvement, couldn't you have a mastering step that runs the track through a cassette player? Or is there a je ne sais quoi that even that would fail to capture?
bryanrasmussen 30 minutes ago [-]
I suppose whatever you send to Spotify will then compress more the tape compression making it sound worse? Also reminded of that recent thing about AI improving YouTube videos. I wonder if Spotify would do that about certain things - small creators, concerts, other live performances.
At any rate I don't think Master - Tape - Spotify would be likely to sound better than just Master - Spotify.
ang_cire 3 hours ago [-]
I just bought a DVD burner/ reader today and a stack of 100 blanks. I'm planning some physical backups of favorite media (songs, books, movies, pictures). My rackmount setup could die to lightning, fire, theft, animals, and I don't want to be terrified whether I have a backup of any particular thing on it. I'm also planning a couple of HDDs for cold storage, but they're less reliable for LTD (long-term drawer) storage than DVDs.
Aldipower 1 hours ago [-]
Sorry, but cold storage HDD archiving is much more reliable in the long term then DVD. Also easier to execute. Simply copy on two different HDDs from different manufactures and you are more or less safe to go.
nickdothutton 2 hours ago [-]
I hope you bought archive grade media. Also I hope the people who make such media did their work well!
id00 9 hours ago [-]
A few years ago I've bought an old cassette deck, ordered a few cassettes on discogs.com (some of them 30+ years old) and even recorded a few mixtapes myself. There is a long forgotten strange feeling to hold a physical media with music. Like it gives it weight...
And surprisingly, the quality is not too bad for my non-audiophile ears. Especially if you go beyond Type-I cassettes
enobrev 6 hours ago [-]
I grabbed a cheap one for my 5 year old with some blank tapes. I remember how much I loved recording my voice, or the TV, and eventually LOTS of radio. Tangible media has more weight than just the physical object. Especially in something as durable as a cassette.
It comes in bursts but when he's into it, he has a ton of fun, The manual nature of it is confusing for him (he's used to instant gratification), like waiting a few seconds at the beginning of the tape so he can record, but something about a cassette makes the whole process easier to explain and, I hope, to understand and visualize.
chestervonwinch 8 hours ago [-]
> Especially if you go beyond Type-I cassettes
Yea, I use Type II cassettes to record on my Tascam 246. I did an experiment where I recorded a track I made digitally to tape and then back into the DAW. I A/B'd them and struggled to differentiate. That being said, I have used some really poor quality Type II tapes, where the difference was obvious.
steveBK123 9 hours ago [-]
I’ve actually started getting 90s-00s era vinyl for some electronic music I used to listen to.
A lot of mixes and singles are unavailable in electronic form. Or maybe they were until they weren’t Anything can disappear in an instant on streaming platforms.
seductivebarry 3 days ago [-]
An essay about how a thirty-year-old mixtape led me to think about technology, memory, and the strange persistence of things we’ve already declared obsolete.
wrs 9 hours ago [-]
Thanks. Digging out my shoebox of college mix tapes right now.
01HNNWZ0MV43FF 9 hours ago [-]
People are real quick to declare things obsolete without thinking about Pareto frontiers.
Tapes and floppies are "obsolete" if you don't have to worry about malicious controllers embedded in flash media or hard drives.
Paper is "obsolete" if you don't have to worry about cost per square inch of displaying static information, or about running without batteries.
SoftTalker 9 hours ago [-]
Surprised a 30 year old cassette is still playable without falling apart.
Maybe I should try some of mine.
lttlrck 6 hours ago [-]
They are surprisingly durable. I have a tape I made in 1990, it's followed me across
continents and been in cardboard boxes, basements and attics. It still plays flawlessly.
Not wanting to push my luck, I archived it. On Minidisc.
I have quite a large CD collection. Two albums from the same era are unplayable due to oxidization, same band Banco De Gaia, pressed at the same plant in the UK too.
ares623 4 hours ago [-]
There is a reason they are often used as archival medium.
Razengan 9 hours ago [-]
You mean undead? Zombie technologies?
seductivebarry 2 hours ago [-]
Pretty much..the combination to listening to a song about vampires on a cassette seemed like the perfect metaphor!
And yeah, I've produced, mixed and mastered the whole album, so I can say for sure, the cassettes sounds much much better and organic then the _same_ master on Spotify. It's a subtle mixture of tape compression, saturation, hiss, eqing, jitter that makes it somehow lively. And it will sound slightly different on every owns tape player.
At any rate I don't think Master - Tape - Spotify would be likely to sound better than just Master - Spotify.
And surprisingly, the quality is not too bad for my non-audiophile ears. Especially if you go beyond Type-I cassettes
It comes in bursts but when he's into it, he has a ton of fun, The manual nature of it is confusing for him (he's used to instant gratification), like waiting a few seconds at the beginning of the tape so he can record, but something about a cassette makes the whole process easier to explain and, I hope, to understand and visualize.
Yea, I use Type II cassettes to record on my Tascam 246. I did an experiment where I recorded a track I made digitally to tape and then back into the DAW. I A/B'd them and struggled to differentiate. That being said, I have used some really poor quality Type II tapes, where the difference was obvious.
A lot of mixes and singles are unavailable in electronic form. Or maybe they were until they weren’t Anything can disappear in an instant on streaming platforms.
Tapes and floppies are "obsolete" if you don't have to worry about malicious controllers embedded in flash media or hard drives.
Paper is "obsolete" if you don't have to worry about cost per square inch of displaying static information, or about running without batteries.
Not wanting to push my luck, I archived it. On Minidisc.
I have quite a large CD collection. Two albums from the same era are unplayable due to oxidization, same band Banco De Gaia, pressed at the same plant in the UK too.