Did they still not release "Bring your own subscription" "login with ChatGPT" and letting people apply their subscription/quota to other apps/services? There are so many use-cases where someone builds a usefull scaffold (e.g. even static website) that could benefit from integration with LLMs but rolling the authentication, having API-keys, free budgets etc. is scary. It would be much better if that could be outsourced to the LLM provider of the user.
It would bear a good lock-in effect for OAI as well
qiller 6 hours ago [-]
Would be great if they provided at least some guidance how to keep this thing on topic. Even the official demo https://chatkit.world/ is not restricted, it happily chats about whatever.
ch4s3 6 hours ago [-]
Oh man this thing tells me my iPhone 13 mini isn’t wide enough to use it, that’s rough.
kelvinjps10 3 hours ago [-]
Doesn't work either on my Samsung s25
joshstrange 6 hours ago [-]
It doesn’t work on my iPhone 17 Pro Max either and when I turn it to landscape it’s buggy and doesn’t work. Great demo…
kingstnap 6 hours ago [-]
Thats like the opposite of what Open AI would really want though.
They want people walking up saying "we commit to spending $100k monthly for the next year let's discuss bulk discounts."
maguay 2 hours ago [-]
Smart for OpenAI to launch, from a product lock-in perspective, since most similar chat sidebars in apps tend to let one choose the AI model from a list that always seems to include Claude as well....
But for that same reason, not sure I'd want to implement this into products since it does lock you into OpenAI, only.
rgbrgb 9 hours ago [-]
> framework-agnostic, drop-in chat solution
Maybe I'm being dumb but is this a generic chat UI for openai models only? Pretty bearish on adoption of this if so. As a pragmatic dev I'd definitely not be keen to bake model lock-in into my UI for functionality as generic as chat.
falcor84 7 hours ago [-]
The openai library works with most other providers by just changing the endpoint url, and this is Apache licensed, so I feel good about using it.
elpakal 3 hours ago [-]
Looks like it supports custom backends
cronelius 2 hours ago [-]
their chatkit demo (chatkit.world) doesn't even work in safari. also "react bindings" and "vanilla js" isn't exactly "framework-agnostic". I don't like the idea of embedding someone else's UI in my app. This seems like an overly generalized solution for a specific set of problems.
teabee89 7 hours ago [-]
> framework-agnostic
Later,
> 2. Install the React bindings
So not so framework-agnostic, or am I missing something ?
compacct27 5 hours ago [-]
They have web components if you want
huflungdung 7 hours ago [-]
[dead]
lukax 9 hours ago [-]
This looks very similar to CopilotKit and AG-UI. With CopilotKit you can have some tools implemented client-side and others server-side using AG-UI.
With ChatKit you can proxy everything through your ChatKit API "proxy" and implement the "agentic" stuff in the proxy.
Even the React APIs look very similar.
Looks like a vendor lock-in and a way to stop the AG-UI ecosystem
peab 8 hours ago [-]
But even with AG-UI,CopilotKit is a paid service. Everyone's trying to do vendor lock in, it's really annoying. They make the dev experience worse and you have to pay for it? It's like every langcrap service out there
lukax 8 hours ago [-]
And CopilotKit needs a JS backend for a proxy that holds the state for the chat which is quite a pain if you want to scalably self-host. Maybe ChatKit will be less lock-in than CopilotKit.
_pdp_ 6 hours ago [-]
There are so many libraries called chatkit or some variation of that including the one I am working on - chatbotkit (I guess some SEO will rub off).
Apart from that, it looks like an interesting initiative, but I fail to see what this is supposed to replace. Widgets? Customer support? I mean, sure, you can create some kind of question-answer bot, but for something more substantial, you'll need a completely different dashboard and backend. I can't see how OpenAI will accomplish this without butchering their existing UI.
nitroedge 9 hours ago [-]
no demo link or screenshots in the Github readme?
OpenAI surely could have had their marketing department create something quick?
https://github.com/OvidijusParsiunas/deep-chat
It would bear a good lock-in effect for OAI as well
They want people walking up saying "we commit to spending $100k monthly for the next year let's discuss bulk discounts."
But for that same reason, not sure I'd want to implement this into products since it does lock you into OpenAI, only.
Maybe I'm being dumb but is this a generic chat UI for openai models only? Pretty bearish on adoption of this if so. As a pragmatic dev I'd definitely not be keen to bake model lock-in into my UI for functionality as generic as chat.
Later,
> 2. Install the React bindings
So not so framework-agnostic, or am I missing something ?
https://www.copilotkit.ai/
With ChatKit you can proxy everything through your ChatKit API "proxy" and implement the "agentic" stuff in the proxy.
Even the React APIs look very similar.
Looks like a vendor lock-in and a way to stop the AG-UI ecosystem
Apart from that, it looks like an interesting initiative, but I fail to see what this is supposed to replace. Widgets? Customer support? I mean, sure, you can create some kind of question-answer bot, but for something more substantial, you'll need a completely different dashboard and backend. I can't see how OpenAI will accomplish this without butchering their existing UI.
> Make your window wider or open on desktop to continue
For a chat app UI?
(BTW, I had to take a screenshot then use image to text inference in order to copy that message)